• → European Space Agency

      • Space for Europe
      • Space News
      • Space in Images
      • Space in Videos
    • About Us

      • Welcome to ESA
      • DG's News and Views
      • For Member State Delegations
      • Business with ESA
      • ESA Exhibitions
      • ESA Publications
      • Careers at ESA
    • Our Activities

      • Space News
      • Observing the Earth
      • Human Spaceflight
      • Launchers
      • Navigation
      • Space Science
      • Space Engineering
      • Operations
      • Technology
      • Telecommunications & Integrated Applications
    • For Public

    • For Media

      • Media
      • ESA TV
      • Videos for professionals
      • Photos
    • For Educators

    • For Kids

    • ESA

    • Meteosat Second Generation

    • Observing the Earth

    • About MSG
    • MSG overview
    • Why we need MSG
    • How MSG works
    • Spacecraft details

      • Stabilisation
      • Architecture
      • Communications
      • SEVIRI
      • GERB
      • Search & Rescue
    • Building and flying MSG
    • Designed for space
    • Reaching orbit
    • Launch and early orbit phase
    • The future
    • Next steps
    • Beyond MSG and MetOp
    • Multimedia
    • Image Gallery
    • Video Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Screensavers

    ESA > Our Activities > Observing the Earth > Meteosat Second Generation

    Satellite stabilisation

    MSG flight model in spin test

    After an intensive trade-off study by European industry, on the choice between using a three-axis versus a spin-stabilized platform for MSG, it was decided in 1994 to continue with the spinning concept.

    It has several clear advantages as it provides:

    • better geometric image quality
    • better spectral and geometric image resolution
    • better mission availability
    • moderate operational complexity
    • the same radiometric performance, at the expense of a slightly larger instrument aperture

    The three axis stabilization would have implied a higher satellite mass at launch, raising the launch costs. It also imposes a very high satellite attitude control complexity, which in turn could imply degraded reliability, which is undesirable for an operational system.

    Last update: 29 November 2012

    Rate this

    Views

    Share

    • Currently 0 out of 5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thank you for rating!

    You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!

    Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!

    174
    Tweet
    • Related links
    • Eumetsat

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • G+
    • Facebook
    • Livestream
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • · Rare merger reveals secrets of gal…
    • · Watching for hazards: ESA opens as…
    • · ESA astronaut Timothy Peake set fo…
    • · Space drives e-mobility
    • · Proba-V opens its eyes
    • FAQ

    • Jobs at ESA

    • Site Map

    • Contacts

    • Terms and conditions