• → European Space Agency

      • Space for Europe
      • Space News
      • Space in Images
      • Space in Videos
    • About Us

      • Welcome to ESA
      • DG's News and Views
      • For Member State Delegations
      • Business with ESA
      • ESA Exhibitions
      • ESA Publications
      • Careers at ESA
    • Our Activities

      • Space News
      • Observing the Earth
      • Human Spaceflight
      • Launchers
      • Navigation
      • Space Science
      • Space Engineering
      • Operations
      • Technology
      • Telecommunications & Integrated Applications
    • For Public

    • For Media

    • For Educators

    • For Kids

    • ESA

    • Meteosat Second Generation

    • Observing the Earth

    • About MSG
    • MSG overview
    • Why we need MSG
    • How MSG works
    • Spacecraft details

      • Stabilisation
      • Architecture
      • Communications
      • SEVIRI
      • GERB
      • Search & Rescue
    • Building and flying MSG
    • Designed for space
    • Reaching orbit
    • Launch and early orbit phase
    • The future
    • Next steps
    • Beyond MSG and MetOp
    • Multimedia
    • Image Gallery
    • Video Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Screensavers

    ESA > Our Activities > Observing the Earth > Meteosat Second Generation

    Satellite stabilisation

    MSG flight model in spin test

    After an intensive trade-off study by European industry, on the choice between using a three-axis versus a spin-stabilized platform for MSG, it was decided in 1994 to continue with the spinning concept.

    It has several clear advantages as it provides:

    • better geometric image quality
    • better spectral and geometric image resolution
    • better mission availability
    • moderate operational complexity
    • the same radiometric performance, at the expense of a slightly larger instrument aperture

    The three axis stabilization would have implied a higher satellite mass at launch, raising the launch costs. It also imposes a very high satellite attitude control complexity, which in turn could imply degraded reliability, which is undesirable for an operational system.

    Last update: 29 November 2012

    Rate this

    Views

    Share

    • Currently 0 out of 5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thank you for rating!

    You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!

    Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!

    38
    facebook
    twitter
    reddit
    google plus
    digg
    tumbler
    digg
    blogger
    myspace
    • Related links
    • Eumetsat

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • Google Buzz
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • · CryoSat hits land
    • · Ariane 5 completes seven launches …
    • · Measuring skull pressure without t…
    • · Malargüe station inauguration
    • · The solar wind is swirly
    • FAQ

    • Jobs at ESA

    • Site Map

    • Contacts

    • Terms and conditions