• → European Space Agency

      • Space for Europe
      • Space News
      • Space in Images
      • Space in Videos
    • About Us

      • Welcome to ESA
      • DG's News and Views
      • For Member State Delegations
      • Business with ESA
      • ESA Exhibitions
      • ESA Publications
      • Careers at ESA
    • Our Activities

      • Space News
      • Observing the Earth
      • Human Spaceflight
      • Launchers
      • Navigation
      • Space Science
      • Space Engineering
      • Operations
      • Technology
      • Telecommunications & Integrated Applications
    • For Public

    • For Media

      • Media
      • ESA TV
      • Videos for professionals
      • Photos
    • For Educators

    • For Kids

    • ESA

    • Observing the Earth

    • Living Planet

    • Meteorological missions

    • MetOp

    • MetOp at a glance
    • Overview
    • Why we need MetOp
    • Facts & figures
    • History
    • Satellite

      • About the satellite
      • Payload Module
      • Service Module
    • Instruments

      • Overview
      • Technical summary
    • Launch

      • Launch sequence
      • Launcher
    • Mission operations

      • Operations
      • Orbit
    • Resources

      • Publications
      • General links
      • Glossary
      • Acronym list
    • Multimedia
    • MetOp images
    • MetOp videos
    • MetOp animations
    • Help
    • Services
    • Subscribe

    ESA > Our Activities > Observing the Earth > The Living Planet Programme > Meteorological missions > MetOp

    ASCAT field of view

    ASCAT instrument design drivers

    The main factors that drive the design of the instrument are:

    • resolution cell size has to be controlled both in the cross-range and range directions (spatial resolution)
    • radar measurements should be limited in their statistical variability (radiometric resolution)
    • measurements should be calibrated within certain limits (radiometric accuracy)
    • gain variation between pairs of beams should be carefully controlled (interbeam stability)

    As with the ERS scatterometer, spatial resolution in the across-range direction is controlled primarily by design of the antenna azimuth footprint – this is one of the factors that lead to the use of such long antennas.


    Spatial resolution in range, in contrast to ERS which used temporal sampling of the received echoes from short, high power transmitted signals, uses a frequency modulation technique in conjunction with relatively long, medium power transmit pulses. The technique illustrated in the diagram considers how two radar (point) targets at differing ranges are identified.

    The radar transmits a pulse whose frequency varies linearly over the pulse duration. Due to the differing ranges of the two targets, two linearly frequency modulated echo signals arrive at the radar receiver separated in time, (the orange and green lines on the diagram). When mixed with a local oscillator signal having the same characteristics as the transmitted signal, two mixing products are produced, f1 and f2, which map to the different target ranges. This process is known as 'de-chirping'.

    Radiometric resolution is determined by the combination of:

    • echo signal-to-noise ratio
    • number of independent echo samples

    Choice of transmitter peak power (120 W) and transmit pulse duration (@ 10 ms) are two factors which ensure that an adequate signal to noise ratio and a sufficient number of independent samples are available.

    Radiometric accuracy and Interbeam stability are closely related. To achieve these objectives the on-board hardware should be stable. A large part of the hardware is therefore supervised by means of a calibration signal. This signal is derived by sampling the transmitted power and injecting a signal of similar magnitude into the receiver input. By examining the calibration signal at the receiver output it is possible to detect changes in the product of the transmitted power and receiver gain and hence to correct for instabilities in these parameters.

    Range discrimination diagram
    Range discrimination diagram

    Last update: 28 June 2006

    Rate this

    Views

    Share

    • Currently 0 out of 5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thank you for rating!

    You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!

    Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!

    39
    Tweet
    • In depth
      • About ASCAT
      • Scanning principle
      • Instrument design drivers
      • Calculation wind speed and direction
        • Description
        • Functional elements
        • Performance
        • Products
        • Calibration
        • Ground Processor Prototype
        • Related articles
          • Measuring wind over the oceans with ASCAT
          • MetOp's instruments
          • A/DCS
          • AMSU-A1
          • AMSU-A2
          • ASCAT
          • AVHRR
          • GOME-2
          • GRAS
          • HIRS
          • IASI
          • MHS
          • SARP-3
          • SARR
          • SEM

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • G+
    • Facebook
    • Livestream
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • · Rare merger reveals secrets of gal…
    • · Watching for hazards: ESA opens as…
    • · ESA astronaut Timothy Peake set fo…
    • · Space drives e-mobility
    • · Proba-V opens its eyes
    • FAQ

    • Jobs at ESA

    • Site Map

    • Contacts

    • Terms and conditions