Credits: Copyright: ESA, Graphics: MPE Spectrum of the quasar APM 08279+5255, showing iron-cloud traces The left picture shows a photo of the quasar, taken by XMM-Newton. The dip in the spectrum of the quasar APM 08279+5255 is caused by the element iron. In a same way that our bones appear dark in X-ray photographs because they are opaque to X-rays, the outflowing iron clouds of APM 08279+5255 are opaque for X-rays that are created at the quasar's centre. At the 'absorption energy' characteristic for iron (marked by the red arrow), some part of the X-ray light is missing.

Credits: MPA/MPE Artist's impression of the new 'unified model' for the different kinds of quasar activity According to this model, for a well-fed black hole, some part of the matter streaming towards the centre never reaches the black hole but is blown apart in a bipolar, cone-like outflow. This outflow is driven by the strong radiation pressure of the central object. In the case of APM 08279+5255, you are looking along the gas stream which is 'X-rayed' by the central light source.

APM 8279+5255 is 13.5 thousand million light years away. Scientists know this because they have estimated a property of its light known as the red shift, which is caused by the expansion of the Universe stretching the wavelengths of light emitted by the celestial object. XMM-Newton’s data showed that iron was three times more abundant in the quasar than in our Solar System.

Since iron is released by exploding stars, according to precise physical phenomena, and scientists think it builds up across the Universe gradually with time. The Solar System formed just 5 thousand million years ago, so it should contain more iron than the quasar, which formed over 13.5 thousand million years ago. The fact that the quasar contains three times more iron than the Sun is therefore a major puzzle.
 
One possible explanation is that something is wrong with the way astronomers measure the age of objects in the Universe. The almost-holy red shift-distance-age conversion would therefore be wrong. Fred Jansen, ESA’s project scientist for XMM-Newton, explains that this would mean rewriting the textbooks. "If you study the evolution of the Universe, one of the basic rules is that we can tie redshift to age. One distinct possibility to explain these observations is that, at the redshift we are looking at, the Universe is older than we think."

If the older-Universe interpretation is wrong, there is only one other, stranger possibility, according to Jansen. Somewhere in the early Universe there must be undiscovered 'iron factories', producing the metal by unknown physical means. Understandably, Jansen is cautious about this, saying, "This is the less likely solution in my opinion."

If such mysterious objects exist, perhaps XEUS (a next-generation X-ray satellite currently under study by ESA for launch sometime in the next decade) will discover them, because it will have the ability to see the very first galaxies.

In the shorter term, ESA is launching INTEGRAL, a gamma-ray-detecting satellite, in October 2002. It will observe exploding stars to study the formation of chemical elements and may explain the anomalous iron observations.

For more information, please contact: Dr Norbert Schartel
European Space Agency
Spain
Tel: 34 91 8131 184
Fax: 34 91 8131 139
E-mail: norbert.schartel@esa.int