NEO Space Mission Preparation
SIMONE
Smallsat
Intercept
Missions to
Objects
Near
Earth
New!! -
For the most detailed and up-to-date
information on the SIMONE mission design, dowload the executive summary from
here
.
Mission
-
The Science
-
The Spacecraft
-
The Ground Segment
-
Contacts
The
Mission
Mission Concept
SIMONE is a unique interplanetary mission concept comprising a fleet of low-cost
microsatellites that will individually rendezvous with a different Near Earth Object
(NEO), each of a distinct spectral and/or physical type. In-situ science measurements
taken by instruments on-board each spacecraft enable the wide diversity in the physical
and compositional properties of the NEO population to be characterised in a highly
cost-effective manner. Analysis of the in-situ measurement data from the SIMONE
rendezvous missions will provide:
-
Valuable scientific knowledge on the nature, origin and processing of NEOs;
-
Critical physical/compositional information needed for the accurate prediction of
impact risk (particularly damage potential) posed by NEOs;
-
Critical physical/compositional information needed for the development of effective NEO
risk mitigation strategies that are specifically tailored for each NEO type.
The SIMONE mission study team is led by QinetiQ (UK) in partnership with the Planetary and
Space Sciences Research Institute (PSSRI) of the Open University (UK), SciSys (UK),
Politecnico di Milano (Italy) and Telespazio (Italy).
Mission Overview
SIMONE can be realised by the use of microsatellite technology - this would be
a world-first for an interplanetary mission. Conducting multiple NEO rendezvous
missions with large conventional spacecraft would be prohibitively expensive. It
is planned to deploy 5 of the SIMONE microsatellites to their intended rendezvous
targets within the budget envelope of an ESA Flexi-mission. In order to achieve
this target, a low-cost approach is needed and this is only attainable by using
microsatellite technology.
The SIMONE microsatellites are based around a single spacecraft system design,
configuration and payload, and a single ground segment, thereby significantly
lowering recurring costs. "Piggyback" launch opportunities on the Ariane Structure
for Auxiliary Payloads (ASAP) on Ariane-5 will be exploited in order to obtain low
launch costs. Traditionally, launch costs are a significant cost driver for
interplanetary missions because a dedicated deep space launch is usually required
for direct injection onto an interplanetary trajectory. Instead, these launches
will place each SIMONE spacecraft into a Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO).
From GTO, on-board propulsion is required to
achieve an Earth escape trajectory, adjust the interplanetary trajectory and
eventually rendezvous with the target NEO. This places high delta-velocity
requirements on a spacecraft that has a tightly constrained mass budget. As a
piggyback payload on an Ariane 5 launch, the mass of each spacecraft is limited
to 120kg. Mission feasibility is assured by the use of efficient low-thrust
solar electric propulsion in order to achieve the demanding rendezvous mission
objectives with a low propellant mass consumption. The ion propulsion system is
driven by lightweight, high power solar arrays that can be efficiently stowed
within the limited launch volume.
The flight of each SIMONE spacecraft is divided
into six different phases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Launch and Early Orbit Phase (LEOP)
|
|
Deployment from an Ariane-5 launch vehicle
into GTO, and attainment of a stable 3-axis attitude control mode
following ejection from the Ariane upper stage
|
|
|
|
|
Complete system functional tests during
visibility periods with the ground station.
|
|
|
|
~9-12 months (depending upon time to optimum Escape Phase start)
|
From highly eccentric GTO, raising of the orbit above the proton
& electron radiation belts into a safe (i.e. low radiation dose)
near-circular "parking orbit" at 300,000km
Wait for the Earth-Escape Phase to
start.
|
|
|
|
|
Expand and phase the orbit using the on-board ion propulsion system
for a lunar swing-by gravity assist manoeuvre to lower delta-V and
propellant consumption.
Exceed Earth gravitational sphere of influence into a heliocentric
orbit with an inclination similar to the target plane.
|
|
|
|
~22-33 months (depending upon the NEO target
orbit)
|
Combination of phased long-duration low thrust arcs and coast (no thrust)
arcs in heliocentric orbit.
Follow an optimised transfer trajectory that ultimately arrives in
vicinity of the target at a low approach velocity and matches the
spacecraft's orbit with that of the target NEO orbit. Trajectory
correction manoeuvres are determined based upon radio navigation techniques.
Acquisition of the target NEO using the
multispectral imager payload for optical navigation relative to the
target.
Long-range approach to the target until reaching a stand-off distance from
2000km down to ~200km ready for the Measurement Phase
|
|
|
|
~4 months (depending upon science data
acquisition plan)
|
Intermediate proximity:
- Co-fly with the target NEO at ~100-200km range
and take in-situ measurements with the payload
instruments to determine size and shape.
Close proximity:
- Close ballistic swing-bys of the spacecraft
at a minimum distance of a few NEO radii (<10km)
to determine gravity field and mass, using the radio
science investigation and laser altimetry. Determine
bulk density from shape, mass.
- "Imaging" swing-bys at <10km altitude to obtain
high-resolution data on NEO surface features/composition.
|
NEO Target Selection
The preliminary selection of the group of NEO
targets for the SIMONE rendezvous missions was performed by the
mission study team. A target selection scheme has been developed in order to
filter the known NEO population by a number of key selection criteria and hence
obtain a short list of candidates for rendezvous. The filter criteria
include:
-
Delta-V
to rendezvous with the NEO targets, after the Earth escape phase, must be
within the remaining delta-V capability of the SIMONE spacecraft (~6km/s is
expected, assuming a ballistic transfer).
-
Size
of the NEO targets must be larger than a given threshold (or brighter than
a given absolute magnitude). A cut-off absolute magnitude of 19.5 is chosen,
corresponding to objects larger than 300m in diameter (large enough for
long-range acquisition by on-board optical sensors and to represent significant
Earth impact damage potential, yet small enough to maintain a diverse sample of
object types).
After filtering, a shortlist containing 15 objects was generated with a good
cross-section of spectral/physical types retained. The shortlist was analysed in
detail and 6 targets were selected by the mission study team in order to satisfy
the primary mission objective of characterising the physical/chemical properties
of different types of NEO. These 6 target objects are:
|
Priority |
Target |
Spectral
type |
Orbit class |
Est. Diameter
[km] |
Comment |
|
2 C-types
(common, poorly characterised, low density?, primitive) |
1996 FG3 |
C |
Apollo |
1.3 effective |
4-hour rotation
Binary (16-hour orbit) Size ratio 0.31 |
|
1989 UQ |
CB |
Aten |
0.56 - 0.76 |
7.7-hour rotation |
|
S-type
(common, from inner main belt, higher temperature silicates) |
1999 YB |
S |
Apollo |
0.64 |
Only S-type left |
|
2 M-types
(metallic?, high density, X-types are P, M or E types) |
2001 CC21 |
X |
Apollo |
0.39 - 1.1 |
Could be P, M, or E |
|
(4660) Nereus
1982 DB |
X |
Apollo |
0.47 - 1.33 |
15-hour rotation
C-type in some refs. |
|
"Pot luck"
(unknown type, select largest) |
1994 CN2 |
|
Apollo |
0.9 - 2.5 |
|
|
Reserve
(known parent body, Vesta) |
(3361) Orpheus
1992 HR |
V |
Apollo |
0.4 |
Parent body Vesta is Dawn mission target
4-hour rotation |
The two selected X-type objects could turn out to be either P, M or E types
after further spectral follow-up observations are made. Thus, a good cross-section
of different NEO spectral types can be characterised by the SIMONE rendezvous
missions for risk assessment (C-types in particular are common but their basic
properties are poorly understood) and science (detailed knowledge of primitive
P or E-types, and metallic M-types). After C-type, M-type is a priority, but
the nearest confirmed M-type metallic object is beyond the delta-V capability
for a SIMONE rendezvous. Hence, a resonant orbit encounter strategy has been
formulated for periodic brief flybys of the M-type asteroid Amun in case that
neither of the selected X-types turns out to be an M-type object.
The Science
Science
Rationale
The NEO population contains a wide diversity of bodies with different physical properties
relating to their origin and subsequent processing by solar radiation, cosmic ray and
impact effects. Ground-based optical telescope observations have enabled a number of
different types of NEO to be characterised by their unique spectral signatures. From the
observations, physical properties such as size, shape, rotation, surface mineralogical
type can be inferred. Radar observations can give excellent information on orbit,
rotation state, surface topography, and binary nature, with the latter being useful to
accurately derive object mass.
Whilst remote observations permit classification of general
compositional types and determination of some physical properties, the range of uncertainty
of this inferred physical information is often large and insufficient for impact risk
assessment and mitigation purposes. Furthermore, some information simply cannot be collected
from ground observations. Only dedicated rendezvous missions can provide the in-depth study
of NEOs that is required to fully characterise their physical and compositional properties
with high accuracy. A multiple rendezvous strategy to sample the different types of NEO at
close range addresses critical gaps in our knowledge of the NEO population that would otherwise
remain, even in the light of the various forthcoming missions. Filling these knowledge gaps is
fundamental to how well we can define and counter the threat posed by NEOs to the Earth in the
future.
The diversity of NEO physical properties (particularly bulk density)
leads to great uncertainty in the magnitude of destruction that an object of a particular size
would cause on Earth. The data provided by multiple rendezvous missions would allow better
predictive tools to be established that would link key properties such as bulk density with
parameters that can be derived from Earth-based or space-based remote observations. Such links
are important in that they would allow a better initial characterisation of a potentially threatening
object (in terms of size, mass and composition), thus influencing the decision regarding an effective
mitigation approach.
Mitigation techniques may involve a slight deflection of a minor
body by either a carefully planned impact (or series of impacts), long-term ablation of the surface,
an explosive impulse, or long-term action of a low-thrust propulsive device. Understanding key properties
of the surface and bulk materials of different types of NEOs and their response to heating or mechanical
stress is thus crucial to the selection and development of effective mitigation techniques. Some
techniques may be wholly ineffective for certain types of target object, such as highly porous or
fractured bodies. Close-up reconnaissance of diverse NEOs is a logical precursor to the success of
missions dedicated to executing specific mitigation strategies.
The multiple rendezvous philosophy echoes one of the recommendations of
the report of the UK Government's Taskforce on Potentially Hazardous Near Earth Objects, namely that
the case for mounting a number of co-ordinated rendezvous missions to visit different types of NEO
should be explored. The recommendation goes on to suggest that they be based on relatively inexpensive
microsatellites. This was the starting point for the SIMONE concept.
Science
Objectives
The primary mission objectives of the SIMONE mission at each different
NEO are to determine (in priority order):
- Bulk density: requiring both the mass and volume (size, shape) to be measured. For the particular spectral/physical class, it then allows predictions of the mass (and thus impact energy) to be made for other objects that are determined to be of the same class from ground observations. Bulk density can also be an indication of porosity.
- Gravity field: spherical/elliptical harmonics of the gravity field, together with a shape model, allow the derivation of large-scale internal density variations using a mass distribution model. These variations may have a bearing on the dynamical behaviour of a similar object on Earth approach, entry and impact, as well as providing extra evidence as to the internal structure for aiding mitigation strategy development.
- Surface topography/morphology: the high-resolution surface information, in conjunction with compositional information, can be interpreted to give indications as to the object's internal structure. Surface features to examine include craters, grooves, fracture lines, regolith and boulders. From surface measurements, a detailed shape model will be constructed to improve mass and hence bulk density determination accuracy.
- Composition: provides spatial information to allow macroporosity to be estimated. Precise elemental/mineralogical composition can only be determined by a spacecraft encounter such as with SIMONE. Variations in composition across the surface will be correlated with topographic/morphological features, adding to the information available for assessment of the object's sub-surface properties/structure.
Science Payload
Instruments
The baseline science payload instruments identified and selected to achieve these objectives are described in the table below in order of priority ('core' payloads are non-shaded, 'high priority' payloads are shaded grey).
|
Experiment |
Measurement Objectives |
Instrument & status |
Performance |
|
Multispectral Imaging System (MIS) |
Size, shape, surface topography / morphology
Contributes to bulk density, mineralogical composition, rotation state and binarity |
AMIE: delivered by CSEM (Switzerland) for SMART-1 mission
Straightforward filter wheel upgrade required |
5.3°´
5.3° field-of-view
1024´
1024 pixel CCD
4-position filter wheel from visible to near-IR
Resolution 1m at 11km |
|
Radio Science Investigation (RSI) |
Mass -> bulk density
Gravity field (J2) |
2-way Doppler using conventional on-board X-band comms. system |
Range rate ~0.03mm/s over 100s
Range 1-10m |
|
X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) |
Elemental composition of most rock forming elements; potential for C detection |
D-CIXS delivered by RAL (UK) & solar monitor delivered by Uni. of Helsinki (Fin) for SMART-1 mission |
2-10° field-of-view
0.5-10keV energies
<150eV resolution |
|
Near-Infrared Spectrometer (NIS) |
Mineralogical composition across surface |
SIR: delivered by MPAe (Germany) for SMART-1 mission |
1.11mrad field-of-view
0.94-2.4m
m wavelengths
6nm resolution |
|
Laser Altimeter (ALT) |
Size, shape, surface topography / morphology
Contribution to mass, gravity field, bulk density |
Clementine LIDAR: delivered by LLNL; Flown on Clementine mission, 1994
1m resolution upgrade needed |
<0.5mrad beam diverge
0.057° field-of-view
|
The total mass of the full baseline payload described above is 13 kg (including margin). It has been found that all instruments can be accommodated on-board the SIMONE spacecraft design, all aligned along the same boresight and within the available mass budget. Their power, data handling and communications requirements can be fully satisfied.
The Spacecraft
 |
Comms/ Power
Payload
Payload FOV
ADCS
Propulsion
Xenon Tank
|
 |
| Overhead Y/-X view |
|
Underside X/-Y view |
Overview
The SIMONE microsatellites will be 3-axis stabilised platforms with integrated avionics, an on-board Xenon ion propulsion system and an X-band communication system with an integral high gain antenna for TT&C data transfer at long ranges from Earth. Two lightweight high power solar array wings generate 1kW (maximum), sufficient to drive all subsystems and payload. The autonomous attitude control system comprises 4 reaction wheels and 6 small hollow cathode thrusters for momentum dumping. On-board attitude determination is performed by the use of 2 sun sensors, 2 gyros and a star tracker. The spacecraft has been designed to survive a high radiation exposure (dose damage and solar array degradation), the launch vibration environment and the extremes of the thermal environment expected during all 5 rendezvous missions over a maximum mission lifetime of 5 years. A summary specification is given below:
|
Characteristic |
Summary |
Comments |
|
Launch mass |
120kg |
Bus body dimensions of 600x600x710mm |
|
Propulsion |
T5 carbon-gridded ion engine |
Specific impulse: 4,500s
Nominal thrust: 18mN
Lifetime: >30,000hours |
|
Propellant |
Up to 27kg of high purity xenon |
Stored at 105 bar BoL |
|
Power generation |
1kW (BoL, AM0 and 1AU)
278W (EoL, AM0 and 2AU) |
New hybrid array development using triple-junction GaAs cells |
|
Power storage |
150Whr (BoL) |
Li-ion cells |
|
Onboard computer |
1750a (16bit machine, 2MIPS) |
Radiation-hard, dual-redundant |
|
Storage |
512Mbit 3D DRAM for payload data
4Mbit for housekeeping storage |
Powered OFF when not required. |
|
Communications |
X-band |
0.5m HGA to 12 or 35m ground antenna |
|
Uplink rate |
Up to 300kbps |
Selectable |
|
Downlink rate |
1.4kbps (minimum) |
For a SIMONE-Earth distance of 2AU |
|
Attitude control |
Absolute pointing: 0.01º
Relative pointing: 10arcsec in 10s |
3-axis using Momentum Wheels & Hollow Cathode Thrusters (HCTs). HCTs use the same propellant supply as the main engine |
|
Attitude knowledge |
Knowledge to better than 0.01º |
Sun and Star Sensors |
Mass Budget
The mass budget of each SIMONE spacecraft is based upon identification of known COTS components
and associated suppliers able to meet the specification, QinetiQ technology development programmes,
and the application of margin where existing items require modifications. The propellant mass
includes a 10% margin. Overall, the mass budget presented contains 11kg of margin and 6kg of
redundant equipment. This enables dual redundancy of critical components, including: the on-board
data handling unit (processor and memory); communications system (low gain antennas, transmitters,
receivers and TWTAs); and the attitude determination & control system (gyros, star tracker heads
and reaction wheels).
Enabling Technologies
It is clear that to achieve the SIMONE mission within 120kg per spacecraft is a challenging goal. However, this is now realisable due to the emergence of a variety of key technologies including:
- Highly compact, yet capable, scientific instruments, enabling the baseline payload to be achieved within 13kg.
- A solar array (2 wings) that stows into a volume of 84 litres, has a mass of only 16kg but can generate 1kW using the latest triple-junction GaAs cells.
- A small gridded ion engine that is now a mature technology. In its latest variant (with graphite acceleration grids), the engine can exceed the necessary lifetime and total impulse requirements for a mission like SIMONE.
- High-density, high-efficiency electronics and RF equipment (processors, memories, amplifiers, travelling wave tubes, etc.) that allow a flexible, capable data handling and communications architecture within a few kilograms.
- High-stiffness fibres and matrices that allow the construction of very lightweight spacecraft structures and pressurised gas propellant tanks with minimum mass.
- Small sensors and actuators (star cameras, sun sensors, momentum wheels and gyros) that offer high performance attitude and orbit control, but from devices that typically are <1kg each in mass.
Ion Propulsion System
The spacecraft design is dominated by the demanding total delta-V capability required to achieve a rendezvous with a typical NEO. The high specific impulse of the QinetiQ T5 gridded ion engine (4,500s), together with its relatively small size, makes it the ideal candidate for this mission, since a low propellant mass can be achieved and the engine can be accommodated within the spacecraft mass budget. The xenon propellant required for a delta-V capability of 10 km/s is approximately 26kg on a 120kg spacecraft. With such a delta-V capability, nearly 60 NEOs become accessible for rendezvous by a SIMONE microsatellite. The carbon-gridded T5 engine has a predicted total impulse capability of 3x106Ns and thrust range of 5-25mN. This equates to, for example, over 30,000 hours of operation at a constant 18mN of thrust, sufficient for the accessible rendezvous targets (~18,000 hours). The thruster is baseline for the upcoming ESA GOCE mission, and is currently undergoing a life testing and qualification programme.
High Power Solar Array
Significantly, a solar array output of ~550W is required to power the T5 engine (for 18mN of thrust). Radiation degradation and the larger distances from the Sun during the encounter, increase the beginning of life power requirement to 1kW (measured at the Earth). Clearly, a large deployable array, which when stowed is highly compact, is therefore also critical to the design. In order to significantly reduce the mass and volume of the solar array to within the launch constraints, a new array technology is being developed whereby 28% efficient GaAs solar cells are attached to pre-tensioned Kapton membranes mounted within rigid tubular frames.
Thick coverglass is used to reduce performance degradation due to radiation exposure, especially during the first month of the mission when the spacecraft is still passing through Earth's trapped proton belt at perigee.
Each of the two steerable array wings have 11 panels and are 3.3m x 0.7m in area. When stowed, each wing occupies a volume of 0.3m x 0.7m x 0.2m. Deployment is controlled and synchronised. The total mass of the two wings is only 16kg, which means that they can be accommodated within the tight mass budget.
The Ground Segment
All SIMONE spacecraft will be identical in design and will have the same operational requirements for Telemetry, Tracking and Command (TT&C). Hence to lower recurring costs, a single mission control centre and a single ground station is foreseen to support the concurrent flight operations of all SIMONE spacecraft. In order to reduce further operations costs, the SIMONE spacecraft will have a degree of on-board autonomy to enable 'off-line' operations during non-critical periods of the missions and to minimise ground station usage. It is envisaged that a smaller (and lower cost) near-Earth ground station will be used during the LEOP, check-out, Parking orbit and Earth escape phases of the missions. The spacecraft will be handed over to a larger deep space ground station to facilitate the required TT&C communications links with the spacecraft during the Interplanetary transfer, Rendezvous and Measurement phases of the missions.
The single mission control centre includes dedicated teams for the telemetry & command data handling of each SIMONE spacecraft. The mission control centre will be responsible for distribution of downlinked payload data from all SIMONE spacecraft to the science data centre for later processing and on-line distribution to the science community using established science data centres. Mission planning and flight dynamics functions provide simultaneous operational support to all SIMONE spacecraft. All SIMONE spacecraft will utilise the same system architecture and software, including that for orbit determination from tracking data, orbit and attitude manoeuvre planning, event sequencing, spacecraft system simulation, command generation for uplink, and telemetry data processing and monitoring. Re-use of existing systems, such as the ESA SCOS 2000 mission control software, is foreseen in order further reduce development costs.
The preferred baseline for spacecraft navigation is for a combination of radio and optical navigation. Radio navigation (using two-way Doppler tracking data at X-band) achieves a high precision range rate and is also used by the Radio Science Investigation during the Measurement phase at the target NEO. Optical navigation (taking advantage of the Multispectral Imager payload instrument) is used for the NEO acquisition, approach and terminal guidance phase. This choice results from a compromise between the requirements of cost, complexity, onboard resource limitations and required accuracy. The image processing and orbit calculations associated with the navigation function are planned to be undertaken on the ground. Special software tools are required to perform the low-thrust interplanetary navigation, rendezvous and 'formation flying' manoeuvre calculations.
Study Team Points of Contact
Mission/Spacecraft Lead
QinetiQ
www.QinetiQ.com
Mr. Nigel Wells
QinetiQ Ltd.
Room 1004, Arthur C. Clarke Building
Cody Technology Park
Farnborough, Hants., GU14 0LX
United Kingdom
Tel. +44 1252 395791, Fax. +44 1252 396331
E-mail: nswells@space.QinetiQ.com
|
Science Lead
PSSRI at the Open University
pssri.open.ac.uk
Dr. Simon Green, Dr. Andrew Ball
Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute
The Open University
Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
United Kingdom
Tel. +44 1908 659596, Fax +44 1908 858022
E-mail: S.F.Green@open.ac.uk, A.J.Ball@open.ac.uk
|
Operations Lead
SciSys
www.scisys.co.uk
Mr. Martin Townend
SciSys Ltd.
Clothier Road
Bristol, BS4 5SS
United Kingdom
Tel. +44 117 971 7251, Fax. +44 117 971 125
E-mail: Martin.Townend@scisys.co.uk
|
Low thrust trajectory optimisation consultant
Politecnico di Milano
www.polimi.it
Prof. Franco Bernelli Zazzera
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Aerospaziale
Politecnico di Milano
Via La Masa, 34 - 20158
Milan
Italy
Tel. +39 2 2399 8323, Fax. +39 2 2399 8334
E-mail: Franco.Bernelli@polimi.it
|
Target selection & targeting strategy consultant
Telespazio
www.telespazio.it
Ettore Perozzi
Telespazio
965, Via Tiburtina - 00156
Rome
Italy
Tel. +39 6 40793233, Fax. +39 6 40793933
E-mail: ettore_perozzi@telespazio.it
|
|
| |