• → European Space Agency

      • Space for Europe
      • Space News
      • Space in Images
      • Space in Videos
    • About Us

      • Welcome to ESA
      • DG's News and Views
      • For Member State Delegations
      • Business with ESA
      • ESA Exhibitions
      • ESA Publications
      • Careers at ESA
    • Our Activities

      • Space News
      • Observing the Earth
      • Human Spaceflight
      • Launchers
      • Navigation
      • Space Science
      • Space Engineering
      • Operations
      • Technology
      • Telecommunications & Integrated Applications
    • For Public

    • For Media

    • For Educators

    • For Kids

    • ESA

    • Space Engineering

    • What we do
    • Directorate of Technical and Quality Management (TEC)
    • Electrical
    • Electrical engineering
    • Control Systems
    • Data Systems
    • Radio Frequency Payload Systems
    • Electromagnetics and Space Environment
    • Power and Energy Conversion
    • Mechanical
    • Mechanical engineering
    • Thermal Control
    • Structures and Mechanisms
    • Mechatronics and Optics, incl. robotics and life support
    • Propulsion and Aerothermodynamics
    • Systems
    • Systems and software engineering
    • Software Systems
    • Systems Engineering, incl. cost engineering
    • Technology programmes
    • Product Assurance
    • Product Assurance
    • Flight Safety
    • Dependability
    • Quality Management and Assurance
    • Materials and Processes
    • Electronic Components
    • Software Product Assurance
    • Standards
    • Requirements and standards
    • European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS)
    • European Space Components Coordination (ESCC)
    • Services
    • ESA calendar of events
    • Subscribe

    ESA > Our Activities > Space Engineering

    What Control Systems innovations are involved?

    First generation AOCS components were quite specific to each type of orbit and application, made up a large amount of spacecraft mass, needed quite intensive ground support and relied on moving parts such as mechanical gyroscopes whose motion could perturb the spacecraft platform and were prone to premature breakdown.

    The aim of current R&D within this sphere is to increase sensor autonomy and develop generic designs capable of serving applications, reducing the overall size and operational complexity of the AOCS subsystem while enhancing spacecraft controllability and boosting their reliability and operational lifetime - applying Active Pixel Sensor (APS) and micro-electronic mechanical system (MEMS) technology where possible.

    New AOCS devices under development include autonomous star trackers capable of reliably identifying spacecraft attitude without any additional navigational information (known as “lost in space” capability). Also being developed are MEMS and Fibre Optic Gyroscopes without any moving parts, instead measuring the Coriolis effect on a vibrating ring or changes in light passing through a fibre optic loop to detect attitude angular rates.

    Many technological developments are also undertaken in the area of modern Control Theory, in order to handle more efficiently the design and validation of more demanding space applications.

    The ultimate goal is to provide space industry with a consistent set of highly efficient techniques and tools for the various engineering phases: modelling, controller design, and system verification, in order to meet costs and planning requirements, despite the fact that control engineering has to contend with space systems whose uncertainty, non-linearity and complexity are steadily increasing.

    A wide scope of modelling tools are being developed to cover interdisciplinary effects as aerodynamics, structural and fluid couplings, together with trajectory optimization. Uncertainty modelling tools such as Linear Fractional Transformations (LFT) and Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) are developed to incoporate the effects of system tolerances, non-linearities, degradations and parametric variations.

    For controller design, various multivariable techniques, following the successful introduction of H-infinity, are being further advanced, such as Linear Parameter Varying Control (LPV) and Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) based techniques.

    For system verification many efforts are ongoing to develop efficient Worst Case Analysis tools in order to provide efficient alternatives to the current Monte Carlo approach, which applies statistical sampling techniques to obtain probabilistic estimates of effectiveness.

    Last update: 29 September 2009

    Rate this

    Views

    Share

    • Currently 0 out of 5 Stars.
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    Rating: 0/5 (0 votes cast)

    Thank you for rating!

    You have already rated this page, you can only rate it once!

    Your rating has been changed, thanks for rating!

    27
    facebook
    twitter
    reddit
    google plus
    digg
    tumbler
    digg
    blogger
    myspace
    • More information
      • Control Systems
        • Why is Control Systems important?
          • What Control Systems innovations are involved?
            • What applications and missions does Control Systems enable?
            • Laboratory
              • Avionics Laboratory
              • Related article
                • ESA preparing ‘sugar-cube’ gyro sensors for future missions

    Connect with us

    • RSS
    • Youtube
    • Twitter
    • Flickr
    • Google Buzz
    • Subscribe
    • App Store
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • · CryoSat hits land
    • · Ariane 5 completes seven launches …
    • · Measuring skull pressure without t…
    • · Malargüe station inauguration
    • · The solar wind is swirly
    • FAQ

    • Jobs at ESA

    • Site Map

    • Contacts

    • Terms and conditions