Meanwhile, Thales Alenia Space took a close look at using in-orbit manufacturing and assembly for a telecommunications satellite in geostationary orbit and an Earth observation satellite in low-Earth orbit.
They found that 95% of a spacecraft could potentially be assembled in orbit, whilst less than 30% could be manufactured in orbit.
The study concluded that in-orbit recycling is still a true challenge; it would be technically extremely complicated, and it is still not clear if the resources used to capture and process the waste in space would be larger than those saved by recycling.
For this reason, Thales Alenia Space proposed to start with in-orbit refurbishment – it would bring immediate benefits and current technology developments are on their way to enabling it. Refurbishing satellites, including replacing broken parts or swapping out payloads, could double their lifetimes!
A very interesting point that the study brought up is related to the legal aspects of producing in space – who is responsible if there is an incident during production? Any accident could lead to the proliferation of new space junk. This needs further exploration.
In the third study, Airbus investigated a preliminary design of an on-orbit servicing station for satellite manufacturing, refurbishing and recycling.
Starting from studying current missions and projects under development or foreseen for on-orbit servicing, the team created seven potential scenarios which were assessed based on five criteria: technology complexity, market trend, timeframe, business impact and sustainability impact. As a result, two scenarios were retained for the following steps of the study.
First scenario looked at an autonomous on-orbit assembly and payload refurbishment for large constellation in LEO while the second explored a versatile on-orbit servicing station (OSS) for Geo S/C, from telecommunication GeoHub to Cloud S/C. The later was expanded into a preliminary design of the space assets required to perform in-orbit manufacturing, testing and integration of large equipment for Customer satellites in geostationary orbit.
The study concludes that platform and support technologies can be developed with a relatively low risk/good confidence in the outcome, duration and cost, due to either being based on extensive heritage (platform equipment) or requiring moderate evolutions based on existing technologies. On the other hand, in-orbit manufacturing technologies (materials and processes) are still in their infancy and their feasibility is uncertain, especially when it comes to additive manufacturing of metals and liquid glues, which suffer from outgassing and require long curation time.