How does SysNova work?
Within SysNova, the Agency will periodically undertake Technical Challenges, using OSIP as the front end for calls for ideas. The Platform allows ESA to publish challenges via campaigns and channels, which could be thematically focused or open and with or without submission deadlines.
Idea phase
Following the publication of a new SysNova campaign on OSIP, teams fulfilling the eligibility criteria shall submit a mission concept proposal via the platform. At this stage, they are able to interact with potential contributors and be provided with feedback on their idea. After the closing of the campaign, all ideas are evaluated and selected concepts are invited to the Proposal Phase.
Proposal phase
Following the publication of the Call for Proposals on esa-star Publication, selected teams shall submit a Challenge Response addressing at least one of the Technical Challenges. Nominally, a maximum of five Challenge Responses will be selected, on the basis of the evaluation criteria, and funded by ESA for the further analysis and design (Challenge Analysis).
Those Challenge Responses not shortlisted will not be discussed by ESA outside the evaluation panel deliberations, and will not be further considered for ESA support.
More in-depth information about drafting a proposal (Challenge Response) can be found here.
Analysis phase
Following ESA´s confirmation, the selected Study Team will proceed into the Challenge Analysis phase. This phase shall have a duration of no more than 6 months.
The draft Challenge Analysis report will be delivered to ESA at the end of this phase and be evaluated, within two weeks from its submission, by an internal board of ESA members on the basis of the following criteria:
- Scientific merit
- Technical feasibility
- Quality of the analyses and technology roadmaps
A Final Review will be held one month after the submission of the Challenge Analysis draft final report. This session will involve both Study teams and ESA members.
Any agreed comments resulting from the Final Review shall be implemented in the Challenge Analysis final report.
Following the Final Review, the ESA board will award a prize to the best Challenge Analysis(ses). However, the Agency reserves the right not to do so in case the quality of the final results are not considered sufficient.
Follow-up phase
One winning team participates, with ESA support, in an ESA internal assessment of the selected Challenge Analysis(es) in the Concurrent Design Facility (CDF).